The Black Hole at the Birth of the Universe
This article was originally written and submitted as part of a Canada 150 Project, the Innovation Storybook, to crowdsource stories of Canadian innovation with partners across Canada. The content has since been migrated to Ingenium’s Channel, a digital hub featuring curated content related to science, technology and innovation.
Our universe may have emerged from a black hole in a higher-dimensional universe, propose a trio of Perimeter Institute researchers in the cover story of the latest Scientific American.
The big bang poses a big question: if it was indeed the cataclysm that blasted our universe into existence 13.7 billion years ago, what sparked it?
Three Perimeter Institute researchers have a new idea about what might have come before the big bang. It’s a bit perplexing, but it is grounded in sound mathematics, testable, and enticing enough to earn the cover story in Scientific American, called “The Black Hole at the Beginning of Time.”
What we perceive as the big bang, they argue, could be the three-dimensional “mirage” of a collapsing star in a universe profoundly different than our own.
“Cosmology’s greatest challenge is understanding the big bang itself,” write Perimeter Institute Associate Faculty member Niayesh Afshordi, Affiliate Faculty member and University of Waterloo professor Robert Mann, and PhD student Razieh Pourhasan.
Conventional understanding holds that the big bang began with a singularity – an unfathomably hot and dense phenomenon of spacetime where the standard laws of physics break down. Singularities are bizarre, and our understanding of them is limited.
“For all physicists know, dragons could have come flying out of the singularity,” Afshordi says in an interview with Nature.
The problem, as the authors see it, is that the big bang hypothesis has our relatively comprehensible, uniform, and predictable universe arising from the physics-destroying insanity of a singularity. It seems unlikely.
So perhaps something else happened. Perhaps our universe was never singular in the first place.
Their suggestion: our known universe could be the three-dimensional “wrapping” around a four-dimensional black hole’s event horizon. In this scenario, our universe burst into being when a star in a four-dimensional universe collapsed into a black hole.
In our three-dimensional universe, black holes have two-dimensional event horizons – that is, they are surrounded by a two-dimensional boundary that marks the “point of no return.” In the case of a four-dimensional universe, a black hole would have a three-dimensional event horizon.
In their proposed scenario, our universe was never inside the singularity; rather, it came into being outside an event horizon, protected from the singularity. It originated as – and remains – just one feature in the imploded wreck of a four-dimensional star.
The researchers emphasize that this idea, though it may sound “absurd,” is grounded firmly in the best modern mathematics describing space and time. Specifically, they’ve used the tools of holography to “turn the big bang into a cosmic mirage.” Along the way, their model appears to address long-standing cosmological puzzles and – crucially – produce testable predictions.
Of course, our intuition tends to recoil at the idea that everything and everyone we know emerged from the event horizon of a single four-dimensional black hole. We have no concept of what a four-dimensional universe might look like. We don’t know how a four-dimensional “parent” universe itself came to be.
But our fallible human intuitions, the researchers argue, evolved in a three-dimensional world that may only reveal shadows of reality.
They draw a parallel to Plato’s allegory of the cave, in which prisoners spend their lives seeing only the flickering shadows cast by a fire on a cavern wall.
“Their shackles have prevented them from perceiving the true world, a realm with one additional dimension,” they write. “Plato’s prisoners didn’t understand the powers behind the sun, just as we don’t understand the four-dimensional bulk universe. But at least they knew where to look for answers.”
– Colin Hunter
Transcript
00:04
if you turn that clock back and look at
00:07
the first instance of the life of the
00:09
universe you notice that as you go back
00:11
in time temperatures get hotter
00:13
densities go higher and at some point
00:15
basically cannot use the standard theory
00:18
that Einstein gave us that's the Big
00:19
Bang singularity classical cosmology
00:23
could describe everything up to like
00:27
back to that time and because every
00:29
physics breaks down there this is the
00:31
time that really really we want to know
00:33
what happens but we don't have enough
00:35
tools we don't have a quick theory to
00:37
describe that maybe the Big Bang as we
00:41
think about it as a singularity in our
00:43
past is not really there but rather a
00:45
mirage of something more complicated
00:47
something that actually happened in one
00:50
higher dimension we found that okay we
00:53
can interpret the singularity in a
00:55
different way at some point a star dies
00:57
a black hole forms in in four dimension
01:00
these Galactus has an event horizon if
01:02
the size of our universe is larger than
01:06
the horizon and if we are living outside
01:09
the horizon then we are protected from
01:11
that singularity if you have a star that
01:14
collapses and out of the remnants of
01:17
that collapsing a star in a four
01:19
dimensional universe a membrane emerges
01:22
the properties of that membrane could
01:24
very well describe the properties of the
01:26
cosmology in which we live in and maybe
01:28
that means that there was no Big Bang
01:29
maybe there was a supernova explosion
01:31
one higher dimension of course there
01:33
would be differences obviously but the
01:35
might be similarity is more than anybody
01:37
might have imagined I think that is one
01:41
possible case to consider lots of other
01:43
brilliant people who had clever ideas
01:45
but I love about cosmology is is asking
01:49
big questions and you can try to answer
01:51
them as ambitious it may sound
01:54
I'm still not happy I want to know more
01:57
I want to know what's beyond the Big
01:59
Bang what happened before that
02:01
so we just try to look back as far as we
02:04
can and where we stopped we will try
02:07
harder