Skip to main content
Ingenium Logo

You are leaving IngeniumCanada.org

✖


This link leads to an external website that Ingenium does not control. Please read the third-party’s privacy policies before entering personal information or conducting a transaction on their site.

Have questions? Review our Privacy Statement

Vous quittez IngeniumCanada.org

✖


Ce lien mène à un site Web externe qu'Ingenium ne contrôle pas. Veuillez lire les politiques de confidentialité des tiers avant de partager des renseignements personnels ou d'effectuer une transaction sur leur site.

Questions? Consultez notre Énoncé de confidentialité

Ingenium The Channel

Langue

  • Français
Search Toggle

Menu des liens rapides

  • Ingenium Locations
  • Shop
  • Donate
  • Join
Menu

Main Navigation

  • Browse
    • Categories
    • Media Types
    • Boards
    • Featured Stories
  • About
    • About The Channel
    • Content Partners

Big Bang – Or Big Bounce?

This article was originally written and submitted as part of a Canada 150 Project, the Innovation Storybook, to crowdsource stories of Canadian innovation with partners across Canada. The content has since been migrated to Ingenium’s Channel, a digital hub featuring curated content related to science, technology and innovation.

Share
Nov 21, 2016
Categories
Sciences
Media
Article
Profile picture for user Perimeter Institute
By: Perimeter Institute
2 big bangs

A new model of quantum cosmology shows how this universe might have been born from the one before it – while avoiding the broken physics of the big bang singularity.

Cosmology has a problem.

The problem begins, as the universe does, with the big bang.

The standard cosmology imagines the universe’s first instant as a singularity: that is, a single point, taking up no space at all, but with all the stuff of the universe inside it. As if all of reality had been divided by zero, the singularity is undefined. It has neither interior nor exterior; it cannot be described. In the face of it, the laws of physics break down entirely.

“This is a problem,” says Neil Turok, cosmologist and director of Perimeter Institute. “The standard cosmology begins with an impossibility.”

Working with Steffen Gielen, a former Perimeter postdoc who is now a fellow at Imperial College London, Turok has cast a fresh eye on the universe’s seemingly impossible beginning. The new research is featured as an Editor’s Suggestion in Physical Review Letters.

Gielen and Turok’s research imagines the big bang as a big bounce – not just the beginning of this universe, but the end of a previous universe. The predecessor universe would have contracted toward a dense state that marked its big crunch end, and our universe’s big bang beginning.

But while that idea is intuitively satisfying – it at least explains where that single point of matter and energy came from – it does not by itself resolve the problems with the singularity. It is still just as impossible, just as indescribable. For all physics can predict, there be dragons.

So how did Turok and Gielen avoid the dragon(s)?

They began by looking at the behaviour of all the stuff present in the early universe. For its first 50,000 years, the universe was dominated by radiation. What matter there was, was at very high energy, and also behaved like radiation. These materials have a special property that turns out to be crucial to this research: they are conformal.

“Conformal” has a precise technical meaning in physics and mathematics, but a shorthand translation might be “does not depend on scale.” Light, for example, is conformal. Light can take the form of radio waves that are kilometres wide, or X-rays that are the width of an atomic nucleus. Maxwell’s equations govern radio waves and X-rays, and make no distinction between them. This is not unique to light: particle physics strongly hints that at very high energy, all matter is likewise blind to scale.

“Our work starts from this observation,” says Turok. “We make the assumption that the early universe is filled with things that have no scale. And then we try to describe a quantum universe that is filled with such material: how does it behave?”

It behaved more simply than the researchers had ever dreamed. They were surprised to discover they could use standard quantum mechanics, with no bells, whistles, or fudge factors added, to describe and predict how the universe grew. Or, winding the film the other way, how it shrinks toward the big bang singularity.

As Turok puts it: “It turns out, to our surprise, that in this very special case, where everything present in the universe is conformal, and all we are studying is the size of the universe, we could quantize the theory exactly, and work out exactly how a universe of one size transitions into a universe of another size, quantum mechanically.”

Describing the growing or shrinking universe is a major accomplishment, but doesn’t slay the dragon. But there, too, the researchers had an idea.

“Quantum mechanics saves us when things break down,” says Gielen. “It saves electrons from falling in and destroying atoms, so maybe it could also save the early universe from such violent beginnings and endings as the big bang and big crunch.”

It turns out that it could.

In the model Gielen and Turok created, the universe approaches the singularity point – and then skips over it. Like a clock that avoids striking midnight by swinging its hands up and out from the clock face, it does this by accessing another dimension.

The “extra” dimension in question is imaginary: it is described by numbers containing the square root of negative one. The quantum universe in this model is described by complex numbers – numbers with both an imaginary and real component. At the point of the singularity, where the clock strikes midnight, it might have no real size, but could still have an imaginary size – and thus still be described by the laws of physics. So the problem of the singularity is resolved, the dragon avoided.

It seems perhaps like a cheat, but imaginary and complex numbers are everywhere in quantum physics. In this work, Turok and Gielen are using the well-established mathematics that describe quantum tunnelling: a quantum mechanical phenomenon in which a particle tunnels through a barrier that is too high for it to clear.

More than a mathematical sleight of hand, quantum tunnelling explains how fusion works in the sun, and is behind established technologies such as tunnelling electron microscopes.

Bottom line: big bounce cosmology – where one universe contracts into a big crunch until another explodes outward as a big bang – is not a new idea. Turok in particular has been a leading proponent of such a cyclical cosmology for more than a decade. But the sticking point has always been the moment of the bounce itself: the singularity.

This new work shows how merely assuming that everything in the early universe was conformal allows one to describe a quantum cosmology that runs the universe backward toward the singularity, smoothly over it, and out the other side. No dragons involved.

No wonder the researchers described their work as “A Perfect Bounce.”

− Erin Bow

Tags
Innovation Storybook
Author(s)
Profile picture for user Perimeter Institute
Perimeter Institute
Follow

Perimeter Institute is a leading centre for scientific research, training and educational outreach in foundational theoretical physics. Founded in 1999 in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, its mission is to advance our understanding of the universe at the most fundamental level, stimulating the breakthroughs that could transform our future. Perimeter also trains the next generation of physicists through innovative programs, and shares the excitement and wonder of science with students, teachers and the general public.

https://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/

More Stories by

Profile picture for user Perimeter Institute
Perimeter Institute
General Relativity

Testing General Relativity with Black Holes

Related Stories

A red plastic telephone with the handset off of the base on a light grey table. There are scratches on the phone which is an angular design. The rotary dial is on the handset and attached to the base by a red spiral cord.

A Phone Call from Below the Arctic Ice - The 50th Anniversary of Arctic III Sub-Igloo Phone Call to Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau

Spliced image, from left to right: a seismometer on mars, a heap of red rhubarb stalks with green leaves, a copper roof of the Canaian Parliament

3 Things you should know about marsquakes, the value of urine, and the chemistry of rhubarb

A dirty glass slide of a stromatolite with a dirty cotton swab at the bottom; a close-up on a bee with a green head and thorax on a yellow flower; a false colour 3D view of the surface of Venus showing volcanoes and lava flowing towards the foreground.

3 Things you should know about how native bees are important pollinators, how saliva is used to clean artifacts, and active volcanism on Venus

A spliced photo, from left to right: Shaun the Sheep in front of a model of ESA’s European Service Module, a top view into a red bucket containing thousands of light-brown, rod-shaped pellets, and a toddler wearing a wool hat and wool sweater holds a grownup’s finger.

3 things you should know about why wool keeps us warm, and about its surprising uses in the garden and in space.

A large impact crater viewed from the rim, a woodern spoon full of small yellow grains, a close up of a forearm being tattooed.

3 things you should know about the untapped potential of millet, the permanence of tattoos, and asteroid airbursts

Three images side by side: a toilet bowl expelling a cloud of droplets, a gloved hand holding a test tube containing a small plant, and an infrared view of Jupiter's volcanic moon Io showing spots of volcanic activity covering the moon.

3 things you should know about flushing the toilet, artificial photosynthesis, and volcanic activity on Jupiter's moon

Headshots of 33 women, showing the diversity of women in AI and Robotics

Women in AI & Robotics: An interview with Founder and CEO, Sheila Beladinejad

A rear view of a person wearing a yellow coat and backpack in winter, a close-up view of bright red poinsettias with small yellow central flowers.

Two things you should know about the science of wind chill, and the Orion spacecraft's selfies.

A woman examining a bottle of olive oil in a grocery store, Gravel terrain in beige with boulders identified in pink, craters in purple, and crater rims in turquoise, A close up of the tread of a winter tire showing deep, wide, jagged grooves and wavy sipes.

3 things you should know about food fraud, how winter tires work and Canadian artificial intelligence headed for the Moon.

Three images side by side: A little girl smells a sunflower, the DART spacecraft’s impact into the asteroid Dimorphos, and a candy apple

3 things you should know about how the DART spacecraft changed the orbit of an asteroid, how we have more than five senses, and how the science of caramel can make you a better cook!

Designed image showing stars representing children who never made it home from residential schools, an eagle representing First Nations, a narwhal representing Inuit, a beaded flower representing Métis peoples, a winding white pathway representing the Road to Reconciliation, and a circle representing being together in a spirit of reconciliation.

Canada’s Federal Interdepartmental Indigenous STEM Cluster – A Force for Cooperation, Empowerment, and Reconciliation

A spliced, three-part image features: a view of the Apollo 11 ascent module flying above the grey Moon on the left, honeybees on a honeycomb in the centre, and a hand holding a fanned-out deck of cards.

3 things you should know about how mathematics is used for space exploration, how honeybees are masters of geometry, and the uniqueness of a shuffled deck of cards.

Footer

About The Channel

The Channel

Contact Us

Ingenium
P.O. Box 9724, Station T
Ottawa ON K1G 5A3
Canada

613-991-3044
1-866-442-4416
contact@IngeniumCanada.org
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Channel

    • Channel Home
    • About the Channel
    • Content Partners
  • Visit

    • Online Resources for Science at Home
    • Canada Agriculture and Food Museum
    • Canada Aviation and Space Museum
    • Canada Science and Technology Museum
    • Ingenium Centre
  • Ingenium

    • Ingenium Home
    • About Ingenium
    • The Foundation
  • For Media

    • Newsroom
    • Awards

Connect with us

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest Ingenium news straight to your inbox!

Sign Up

Legal Bits

Ingenium Privacy Statement

© 2023 Ingenium

Symbol of the Government of Canada
  • Browse
    • Categories
    • Media Types
    • Boards
    • Featured Stories
  • About
    • About The Channel
    • Content Partners